Method · Scoring · Award criteria

How contracting authorities score your bids: criteria, formulas and scoring methods in 2026

📅 October 2026 ⏱ 8 min read 🏛 CezanneAO

You have submitted a strong bid, but you don't know how the buyer will score it. Understanding how bids are scored in public procurement lets you anticipate your competitors' scores, position your price strategically and highlight your strengths in the technical proposal. This guide explains the most common formulas and the European rules that apply, with national examples.

The legal framework: which criteria are allowed?

Under the 2014 European procurement directives (Article 67 of Directive 2014/24/EU), contracting authorities award contracts on the basis of the most economically advantageous tender (MEAT), assessed on price or cost alone or, more often, on the best price-quality ratio.

Buyers are free to define the criteria they use, provided that they:

The most frequently used criteria

💰 Price (or cost)

Almost always used. Typical weighting: 40% to 60%. For works contracts, often around 40-50%.

🔧 Technical merit

Organisation, methodology, quality of human and material resources. Typical weighting: 40% to 50%.

📅 Completion time

For works or delivery contracts. Often a sub-criterion of technical merit. Weighting: 5% to 15%.

🌱 Sustainability

Rising sharply since 2020. CO₂ emissions, local jobs, accessibility, environmental certifications. Weighting: 5% to 20%.

🎓 Team quality

Experience of the proposed key staff, training, certifications. Common for intellectual services (architecture, engineering, consulting).

🔒 After-sales / Warranties

For supply and equipment contracts. Warranty period, response time, spare parts availability.

Scoring methods for the price criterion

The method used to calculate the price score must be set out in the tender documents. Here are the three most common methods:

Method 1: ratio to the lowest bid

Price score = (Lowest price / Your price) × Maximum score

Example: maximum score = 20. Lowest price among bidders = €90,000. Your price = €100,000.
Your score = (90,000 / 100,000) × 20 = 18/20

This is the most common method. It clearly favours the cheapest bids.

Method 2: ratio to the average bid

Price score = (Average price / Your price) × Maximum score

The bidder offering the average price gets the maximum score. Prices that are too low or too high are penalised. This method is used less and less, as it is considered not very objective.

Method 3: linear interpolation between thresholds

Price score = Max score − [(Your price − Floor price) / (Ceiling price − Floor price)] × Max score

The buyer sets a floor price (maximum score) and a ceiling price (zero score). Your score depends on where you sit between the two.

A worked example of a final score

Architecture and engineering contract — Media library (construction budget: €2m)

Criteria: Price 40% — Technical merit 50% — Sustainability 10%

CriterionWeightingYour score /20Competitor A /20Competitor B /20
Price40 %162014
Technical merit50 %171415
Sustainability10 %181216
Final score /20 100 % 16,9 16,0 14,9

Score = (16×0.4) + (17×0.5) + (18×0.1) = 6.4 + 8.5 + 1.8 = 16.7/20. Competitor A has the best price but a weaker technical score. You win this contract despite a higher price.

How can you optimise your score?

1. Read the tender documents carefully before pricing. They set out the criteria, their weighting and sometimes the sub-criteria and their scale. This is your roadmap for optimising every point.

2. Estimate your competitors' prices. On recurring contracts (same buyer, same type of service), award information from previous contracts is often public and available on the platforms. You can use it to calibrate your price positioning.

3. Don't sacrifice technical merit for price. One more point on the technical criterion (50% weighting) is often worth more than a 5 to 10% price cut (40% weighting). Simulate both scenarios before submitting your bid.

4. Maximise the secondary criteria. Bidders often underestimate sustainability (10%). If you can get the maximum score on this criterion, it's a real competitive advantage.

⚠️ Abnormally low tender: if your price is far below the other bids, the buyer must ask you to justify it (Article 69 of Directive 2014/24/EU). If you cannot show that your price is achievable, your bid may be rejected. A very low bid can therefore backfire.
💡 Tip: Some buyers publish their criteria with detailed sub-criteria and a precise scale (e.g. "site organisation: out of 5 points"). Ask for access to the award reports of similar past contracts from the same buyer to understand how they actually scored the bids. Access-to-documents rules in most member states give you this right.

Bid better with CezanneAO

Tracking of your ongoing bids, technical proposal library, targeted monitoring: CezanneAO helps you structure each response to maximise your score on the award criteria.

Try CezanneAO

Frequently asked questions

The European directives allow it: the most economically advantageous tender can be assessed on price alone. But member states may restrict this, and most do for intellectual services. In Spain, for example, quality criteria must weigh at least 51% for intellectual services; in Italy, architecture and engineering services above €140,000 must be awarded on the best price-quality ratio; in France, a single price criterion is reserved for standardised supplies and services whose quality cannot vary. Always check the national rules and the tender documents.
Any unsuccessful bidder can ask the buyer for the reasons its bid was rejected and for the characteristics of the winning bid (Article 55 of Directive 2014/24/EU). If you suspect an irregularity (criteria not respected, discrimination, favouritism), you can lodge a pre-contractual review before the contract is signed, during the standstill period (at least 10 days in most cases), with the competent review body: in France, the administrative court; in Germany, the public procurement tribunal (Vergabekammer); in Spain, the contract review tribunals; in Italy, the regional administrative court (TAR). Act quickly: in practice, as soon as you receive the rejection letter.
Yes. According to the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU, all criteria and sub-criteria that affect how bids are scored must be made known to bidders before they submit their bids. A buyer that discloses sub-criteria after bids are submitted commits an irregularity that may lead to the procedure being annulled. In practice, some sub-criteria are not published if they only serve as guidance for the panel and have no effect on the final score.

Found this article useful? Share it: